FDA finally takes action on toxic Red Dye 3
By isabelle // 2024-12-11
Copy
 
  • The FDA's prioritization of food industry interests over public health has allowed harmful additives, like Red Dye 3, to persist in the food supply.
  • Red Dye 3, known to cause cancer and other health issues, was banned in cosmetics in 1990 but remains in food.
  • A coalition of advocacy groups, scientists, and lawmakers has pressured the FDA to ban Red Dye 3.
  • Under President-elect Trump's administration, there is hope for stricter regulations, potentially led by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
  • The FDA's recent decision to act on Red Dye 3 is a step forward, but more action is needed to ensure food safety.
For far too long, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has placed the interests of food companies ahead of public health. It’s a practice that has allowed harmful additives, like Red Dye 3, to remain in our food supply despite clear evidence of their carcinogenic effects. Although the recent confirmation by FDA Deputy Commissioner for Human Foods, Jim Jones, that the agency intends to finalize its decision on Red Dye 3 within weeks is a step in the right direction, it’s a move that should have been made decades ago.

The FDA’s history of inaction

Red Dye 3, or FD&C Red No. 3, has been known to cause cancer in animals since the 1980s, and it has also been linked to gut health problems and behavioral issues. In 1990, the FDA banned its use in cosmetics and externally applied drugs, but it continued to allow the dye in our food. This double standard is a glaring example of how the FDA has prioritized food industry profits over consumer safety. The Delaney Clause of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act mandates that any food additive found to cause cancer must be banned, yet the FDA has dragged its feet for more than three decades. The recent push for a ban on Red Dye 3 has been led by a coalition of consumer advocacy groups, scientists, and lawmakers. A petition filed by 24 organizations and scientists, along with a letter signed by 22 members of Congress, has put significant pressure on the FDA to act.

Will the FDA change its ways under the Trump administration?

As we approach a new administration under President-elect Donald Trump, there is renewed hope that the FDA will finally take decisive action on Red Dye 3 and other toxic ingredients. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has been tapped to be the health secretary, has a history of advocating for stricter regulations on food additives. Kennedy has spoken out against the “poisoning” of our children through harmful chemicals in our food supply, and if he takes charge of the FDA, there is some hope that he will prioritize public health over corporate interests. Under Kennedy's leadership, we could see a ban on not just Red Dye 3, but other harmful additives that have been allowed to persist in our food supply for far too long. The FDA’s decision to finally act on Red Dye 3 is a welcome development, but it should have happened years ago. The agency’s history of inaction and its prioritization of industry interests over public health are deeply troubling. However, with the potential for significant change under a new administration, there is hope that Americans and their families will no longer find potentially deadly foods on store shelves. The ban on Red Dye 3 is long overdue, and it’s a step that many of us have been waiting for. As we look to the future, it’s crucial that the FDA and other regulatory bodies prioritize public health over corporate profits. Banning Red Dye 3 will be a great start, but there are still so many other types of toxins and pesticides poisoning our food supply that it will take a while before our food will truly be safe and free from harmful additives. Sources for this article include: FoodSafetyNews.com NYPost.com EHN.org
Copy