Trump administration unveils shocking details of USAID’s funding of mainstream media outlets

By finnheartley // 2025-02-06

Copy

The Trump administration revealed USAID funneled millions to major news organizations like Politico, NYT, Reuters, and AP, sparking debate on press integrity and ethics.
Funding, ostensibly for media development abroad, is accused of promoting government propaganda and compromising media independence, raising ethical concerns.
Revelations have broader implications, with critics alleging mainstream media complicity in pushing government narratives at the expense of public interest.
Calls for accountability and transparency have emerged, with demands for full financial disclosures and ethical reviews, and some advocating for criminal prosecutions.
The scandal has led to potential regulatory actions and a reevaluation of the relationship between government and media, with mixed public reactions and concerns over press freedoms.

In a startling development, the Trump administration has exposed a covert operation where USAID, the United States Agency for International Development, funneled millions of dollars to major news organizations, including Politico, Reuters, Associated Press, and the New York Times. This revelation has ignited a nationwide debate on the integrity of the press and the ethical implications of government funding in journalism.

The funding details

According to White House spokesperson Carolyn Levitt, Politico received over $8 million in taxpayer dollars, which propped up the organization and enabled it to expand its operations and journalistic staff. The New York Times, Reuters, and Associated Press also received substantial sums, though the exact figures are still under investigation. These funds were ostensibly intended to support media development and democracy promotion abroad, but the administration's findings suggest a more insidious purpose.

The role of government propaganda

The revelations have raised serious concerns about the role these media outlets played in promoting government propaganda and suppressing independent journalism. Critics argue that this funding compromised the objectivity and independence of these news organizations, turning them into extensions of government messaging. Sean Davis, co-founder of The Federalist, pointed out that Politico was instrumental in censoring the Hunter Biden laptop story and peddling the illegal Supreme Court leak, actions that have had far-reaching consequences.

The broader implications

The funding scandal has broader implications for the media landscape in the United States. Independent journalists and media critics have long alleged that mainstream media outlets have been complicit in pushing narratives favorable to the government, often at the expense of public interest. Mike Adams, founder of Brighteon.com and publisher of NaturalNews.com, expressed both elation and fury over the revelations, stating, "This is a defining moment. The truth is finally coming to light, and it's clear that these so-called 'trusted' news sources have been nothing more than government propaganda mills."

A call for accountability

The exposure of this funding has sparked calls for accountability and transparency. Many are demanding that these media organizations disclose the full extent of their financial ties to the government and undergo rigorous ethical reviews. Some, like Adams, have gone further, advocating for criminal prosecutions of top executives at these outlets for their role in disseminating misinformation and promoting harmful narratives.

The future of media

The future of these media giants is now in question. The Trump administration has hinted at potential regulatory actions, including the possibility of revoking their operating licenses and dismantling their operations. The administration argues that these organizations have violated the social contract with the American people and have acted against the principles of a free press. The public reaction has been mixed. While some support the administration's stance, others warn against overreach and the potential erosion of press freedoms. Civil liberties groups have called for a balanced approach, emphasizing the importance of independent journalism in a democratic society.

Conclusion

The Trump administration's unveiling of USAID's funding of mainstream media outlets has shaken the foundations of American journalism. As the debate continues, one thing is clear: the relationship between the government and the media is undergoing a profound reevaluation. The integrity of the press and the ethics of government funding in journalism are now under the microscope, and the outcomes of this scrutiny will have far-reaching implications for the future of information and democracy in the United States. Watch this Feb. 6 episode of "Brighteon Broadcast News" as Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, talks about media bloodbath as Politico, Reuters, AP and NYT all revealed to be funded by government slush money. This video is from the Health Ranger Report channel on Brighteon.com.

NATURAL NEWS