CBS under fire for editing Kamala Harris's "60 Minutes" interview, FCC investigates alleged news distortion
By isabelle // 2025-02-09
Copy
 
  • CBS’s 60 Minutes is accused of heavily editing former Vice President Kamala Harris’s interview to make her appear more coherent and presidential.
  • The FCC is investigating whether CBS’s editing practices constitute “news distortion,” potentially impacting CBS and Paramount.
  • Unedited transcripts reveal significant edits, including reducing a 179-word rambling answer to 20 words, sparking criticism of deceptive practices.
  • Former President Trump filed a $10 billion lawsuit against CBS, accusing the network of election interference and demanding it lose its broadcasting licenses.
  • The FCC’s investigation and public backlash highlight concerns about media bias and the need for accountability in journalism.
CBS’s 60 Minutes has been accused of heavily editing former Vice President Kamala Harris’s interview to make her appear more coherent and presidential after she started spewing her typical rambling and nonsensical answers. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is now investigating whether the network’s editing practices constitute “news distortion,” a move that could have significant repercussions for CBS and its parent company, Paramount. The controversy comes as President Trump has filed a $10 billion lawsuit against the network, accusing it of election interference. The unedited transcript, released Wednesday by FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, reveals stark differences between Harris’s original responses and the polished version that aired. In one instance, Harris’s 179-word rambling answer about U.S. diplomatic efforts with Israel was trimmed to just 20 words, removing her trademark “word salad” and leaving viewers with a far more concise and favorable impression.

A pattern of deceptive editing

The discrepancies first came to light when CBS aired a promo for the interview on Face the Nation, featuring Harris struggling to articulate her thoughts on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Yet, when the full interview aired on 60 Minutes, her answers were noticeably shorter and more polished. A CBS source admitted to the New York Post that the edits did Harris “a lot of favors and makes her seem more succinct.” In one particularly glaring example, Harris’s original response to a question about the Israel-Hamas war spanned 140 words, filled with meandering reflections and repetitive phrases. The broadcast version, however, was trimmed to a tidy 56 words, omitting her lengthy digressions. Critics argue that such editing misrepresents Harris’s actual communication skills, potentially influencing public perception ahead of the 2024 election.

Trump’s outrage and legal action

Former President Trump wasted no time condemning CBS, calling the network’s actions “deceitful” and “election-changing.” In a fiery post on Truth Social, Trump declared, “CBS and 60 Minutes defrauded the public by doing something which has never, to this extent, been seen before.” He accused the network of intentionally distorting the news to benefit Harris and demanded that CBS lose its broadcasting licenses. Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit against CBS alleges that the network engaged in “news distortion” to influence the election. While CBS has denied any wrongdoing, the FCC’s investigation could complicate matters for the network, particularly as it seeks regulatory approval for Paramount's $8 billion merger with Skydance.

FCC steps in amid public backlash

FCC Chairman Brendan Carr, a Trump appointee, has taken a firm stance on the issue, releasing the unedited transcript and video to the public. “Transparency here is important,” Carr said in a statement. “The FCC’s review will continue, and we look forward to the public’s feedback.” The agency has opened a docket to investigate whether CBS violated rules against intentional news distortion, a move that could set a precedent for media accountability. While CBS maintains that its editing was standard practice for “time, space, or clarity,” critics argue that the network crossed a line by selectively presenting Harris in a more favorable light. Catherine Herridge, a former CBS News investigative reporter, criticized the network on social media, stating, “@60Minutes did then-VP Harris a favor in the edit room.” The controversy underscores growing concerns about media bias and the lengths to which some outlets will go to shape public opinion. As the FCC investigates and Trump’s lawsuit moves forward, the American public is left to grapple with the implications of such deceptive practices. These revelations are a long-overdue reckoning for a mainstream media that has often been accused of favoring liberal candidates. As Carr and the FCC seek to hold CBS accountable, many are hopeful that this case will serve as a turning point in restoring trust in journalism. Sources for this article include: ZeroHedge.com NYPost.com NYPost.com
Copy