CLIMATE DESTRUCTION CULT: Geoengineers want Boeing 777s to dump SULFUR in the sky, risking ACID RAIN CATASTROPHE
By sdwells // 2025-05-01
Copy
 
Look, up in the sky, it’s a bird, it’s a plane, no… it’s chemtrails. That’s right, the multiple-decade-long “conspiracy theory” turns out to be another reality, just like 9/11 being an inside job, and dizzy Joe Biden suffering dementia the whole time in office. It’s all coming down, pardon the pun. Remember the term acid rain? It’s real. Bromium, aluminum, strontium – they’re all being sprayed in our skies relentlessly and being ingested by Americans daily. What’s next, spike proteins and venom peptides?
  • Geoengineering Gone Rogue: Scientists propose using modified Boeing 777 jets to spray millions of tons of sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere — mimicking volcanic eruptions — to cool the planet, but critics warn it could trigger acid rain, ecosystem collapse, and irreversible climate disruptions.
  • Acid Rain & Toxic Skies: The plan risks reintroducing acid rain, a proven environmental disaster that destroys forests, poisons waterways, and corrodes infrastructure, while also exposing populations to toxic particulates like bromine, aluminum, and strontium.
  • Covert Experiments & Conspiracy Claims: Public figures like RFK Jr. accuse DARPA and governments of secretly conducting geoengineering experiments, calling it a "crime against humanity," while skeptics link chemtrail conspiracy theories to real-world sulfur-spraying proposals.

Scientists Propose Risky Geoengineering Plan to Spray Sulfur Dioxide, Raising Fears of Environmental Harm

A controversial plan to combat climate change by spraying sulfur dioxide into the atmosphere has sparked alarm among scientists and environmental advocates. Researchers from Rutgers University, University College London, and Yale have proposed modifying Boeing 777 jets to release millions of tons of sulfur dioxide annually — a technique known as stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI). While proponents argue it could cool the planet, critics warn it may trigger acid rain, harm ecosystems, and create irreversible climate disruptions. The debate has intensified after public figures like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. accused government agencies, including DARPA, of secretly conducting similar experiments. The study, published in Nature Ecology & Evolution and Earth’s Future, suggests injecting sulfur dioxide at lower altitudes (42,000 feet) using existing aircraft, rather than developing specialized jets. However, the approach comes with severe trade-offs. At this altitude, sulfur particles fall faster, requiring three times more aerosol to achieve the same cooling effect — dramatically increasing risks like acid rain and human exposure to toxic particulates. “This low-altitude strategy would strongly increase side-effects such as acid rain,” the researchers admitted. The plan mirrors the 1991 Mount Pinatubo eruption, which temporarily cooled the planet but also caused widespread environmental damage. The proposal has drawn sharp criticism from environmental activists and public figures. RFK Jr., in a recent interview, linked such geoengineering efforts to covert military programs. “We will soon end this crime against humanity and our planet,” he declared, accusing “plutocrats” of conducting uncontrolled experiments. When pressed on who was behind alleged aerosol spraying, he suggested DARPA’s involvement, stating, “We [HHS] don’t do that. It’s done — we think — by DARPA.” The British government’s recent push for geoengineering trials has further fueled concerns. Critics argue that once started, such programs could become permanent, as abruptly stopping them might trigger catastrophic “termination shock”—a sudden rebound of global warming. The study acknowledges that using existing aircraft could lead to “unilateral deployment” by governments or private entities without global oversight. Jim Lee, an anti-geoengineering researcher, warns that commercial aviation emissions already mimic large-scale atmospheric modification. “This isn’t a solution—it’s engineering dependence on a dangerous intervention,” Lee argues. Historically, geoengineering has been framed as an emergency measure, but skeptics say it distracts from reducing carbon emissions. Acid rain, a proven consequence of sulfur pollution, devastates forests, waterways, and infrastructure—raising questions about whether the cure is worse than the disease. As scientists and policymakers debate sulfur spraying, the public faces a stark choice: trust in unproven, high-risk geoengineering or demand accountability from the institutions promoting it. With environmental stakes this high, the world may soon learn whether manipulating the atmosphere is a bold solution—or a blueprint for disaster. Check out ClimateAlarmism.news for updates on psychotic billionaires spending big chunks of their money to spray poisons over America to make us all sick while trying to block out the sun. Somebody please put these terrorists in jail. Sources for this article include: NaturalNews.com BezoEarthFund.org JonFleetwood.substack.com TheGatewayPundit.com
Copy